Crawl access
Optimised directives and clean visibility for the leading AI crawlers, so models can reach your content.
robots · llms.txt · render
FREE · 10-SIGNAL AI VISIBILITY SCORE
Does ChatGPT cite your brand? Find out in 10 seconds.
Enter a domain. We run the ten structural checks ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude and AI Overviews use to decide whether to cite a brand — and return one honest 0–100 score with a fix list.
FREE · NO EMAIL · SCORE IN ~10 SECONDS · SHAREABLE PERMALINK
Monitoring across
ChatGPT Perplexity Gemini Claude Brave Search AI Overviews Copilot +5 more
Live benchmark & results
How real brands score
Real scores from the same 10-check run you'll get. Fortune-500 budgets, mid-band scores — the citation game is wide open. Click any card to re-run it live.
Snapshot 2026-05-05 · scores update on every re-run
56 Nike nike.com Citation gaps Re-run live 71 Salesforce salesforce.com Patchy presence Re-run live 76 Capital One capitalone.com Solid baseline Re-run live 64 Citable [us] citable.agency Patchy presence Re-run live
Outcomes from real engagements — no vanity metrics
+44
points of Citable score in 14 days. Documented, re-runnable in the public checker.
SOURCE · AGENTESVA CASE STUDY, 2026 Live
public scorecards in the open AI Readiness Registry — the same database every number on this page reconciles with.
SOURCE · LIVE REGISTRY 12
AI answer engines monitored, from ChatGPT and Perplexity to Google AI Overviews.
SOURCE · LIVE MONITORINGThe domains behind the numbers
All case studies 21 → 65 AgentesVA Marketplace app · Citable score · 14 days Crossed from Invisible to Patchy presence in two weeks — schema, FAQs, an external entity, and a Google Business Profile. Read the case 0 → 76 fernandoangulo.com Entity disambiguation · Citable score · 230 days New domain to Solid baseline — now the entity AI returns for “Fernando Angulo” and for “GEO specialist”. Read the case 0 → 17/50 B2B SaaS · Series A Share of Answer · ICP prompts cited · 90 days From zero citations in ChatGPT and Perplexity to 17 of 50 ICP prompts — including 9 of the top 12. Read the case
Where citations are decided
A high score makes you readable. The rest of the internet makes you cited.
Those ten signals are table stakes — they make AI engines able to read you. But most citations aren't decided on your domain. They're decided on the sources the model already trusts to answer for you.
On your site
Table stakes- Schema & structured data
- Clean, crawlable architecture
- Author & entity signals (sameAs)
- Helpful, extractable on-page content
Necessary. Makes you readable. Not where it's won.
The rest of the internet
Where it's decided- G2, Capterra & review sites
- Reddit, forums & communities
- Comparison pages & listicles
- Press, podcasts & earned mentions
Most citations live here — not on your site.
On-site makes you readable. Off-site makes you cited. Most agencies stop at the first.
How we work both halvesMethod
Ten signals. One number. Zero spin.
Most "AI SEO" tools sell you opacity. We weight ten structural signals AI engines actually read — schema, entity, freshness, factual density, third-party trust — sum them into a 0–100 score, and tell you exactly which one is bleeding.
THE CITE FRAMEWORK
Four levers decide whether a model cites you.
Each lever has a score, a baseline, and a delta you can track month over month. No vibes.
Identity
Verifiable structured data and entity grounding across knowledge graphs — so a model knows which brand you are.
schema · entity graph
Trust signals
The third-party citations, mentions and authority signals that make a model confident to name you.
Mentions 0.664 · backlinks 0.218 — Ahrefs, 75k brands
Extractability
Content structured so a model can lift a clean, quotable, accurate answer about your brand.
On-page structure
How an engagement runs — Measure → Repair → Compound
Full methodology [1]
Measure
We run 50 brand-relevant prompts across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and AI Overviews. You get a baseline Share-of-Answer per engine, per prompt cluster.
→ Artifact · Baseline report
[2]
Repair
Schema, entity graph, sameAs sources, AI crawler access, content extractability rewrites. We close the structural gaps that prevent AI engines from citing you confidently.
→ Artifact · Prioritized fix list, shipped
[3]
Compound
Monthly re-checks track lift over time. Every shipped fix is attributable to a specific score delta — no vanity metrics, no SEO theater.
→ Artifact · Monthly delta report
See all ten signals we check — and the sourced data behind them
CHECK 01
Schema markup
Organization JSON-LD with sameAs pointers AI engines parse to resolve your brand as an entity.
CHECK 02
AI crawler access
robots.txt allows GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended, OAI-SearchBot.
CHECK 03
Author entity
Person schema with sameAs pointers — authors recognised as Knowledge Graph entities lift the whole domain.
CHECK 04
Wikipedia presence
Encyclopedic article — corpus signal AI engines weight heavily on entity trust.
CHECK 05
Wikidata sameAs
Linked-data entity with verified sameAs pointers across the open web.
CHECK 06
Google Knowledge Graph
Recognised as a distinct entity in Google's brand-knowledge layer.
CHECK 07
Content freshness
dateModified within 60 days — half of Perplexity's citations point to content published this year.
Source: Seer Interactive, 2025CHECK 08
Factual density
Stat-bearing patterns per page — Princeton GEO research: adding statistics lifts citation visibility 30–40%.
Source: Aggarwal et al., KDD 2024CHECK 09
Trust-seed profiles
Trustpilot, LinkedIn, GitHub — branded mentions correlate 0.664 with AI Overviews visibility; backlinks just 0.218.
Source: Ahrefs · 75k brands, 2025CHECK 10
llms.txt manifest
Root manifest for AI agents — tracked as a hedge; not a confirmed ranking signal today.
The 0–100 ladder
0–39
Invisible
AI engines cannot reliably surface your brand. Foundational structural work needed before targeted GEO investment makes sense.
40–59
Citation gaps
AI engines find you sometimes. Critical signals are missing or noisy. Targeted fixes can lift you into reliable citation range fast.
60–74
Patchy presence
You appear in some answers but lose to competitors on key prompts. The structural foundation is there — sharpen it.
75–89
Solid baseline
You are reliably citable across the major AI engines. Remaining work is fine-tuning entity disambiguation and content depth.
90–100
Citation-ready
Strong AI readiness across all ten structural signals. You are in the top tier of citation candidates for your category.
Score updates each time a domain is rechecked. We treat the band as the strategic signal — the number is just where you sit inside it.
Programs & pricing
Every price published. No discovery calls.
Four ways we engineer visibility — pick one or stack them. Productized fixed-scope projects and retainers, depending on the work.
S—01
GEO Optimization
Generative Engine Optimization. We model what makes AI engines cite a brand as the primary authority — then engineer that into your site.
Citation modeling per engine · Entity graph repair · Content reframing for AI
S—02
Technical SEO
Search excellence reframed for the semantic web. Schema, Core Web Vitals, crawl budget, and AI-Overview-ready structured data.
JSON-LD audit + deploy · Crawl + index health · AI Overview eligibility
S—03
Web Development
Astro/Next.js builds tuned for AI ingestion. Performance budget, accessibility, structured data baked in from day one.
Astro 5 + Vercel ship · Schema-first architecture · Lighthouse 95+ target
S—04
AI-Ready Infrastructure
Your stack, AI-ready. Kubernetes, observability, security, CI/CD, and cost optimization. Cloud agnostic across AWS, Azure, GCP, OCI, and Hetzner.
Cloud cost + observability · Vault + access hardening · GEO-safe deploy pipelines
Start with the audit. Fixed scope, fixed price.
The standalone AI Visibility Audit is €1,200 (50 prompts × 4 engines, 7–10 working days). Full implementation engagements published transparently — no anchoring, no haggling.
€1,200 starting
AI Visibility Audit · 50 prompts × 4 engines · 7–10-day turnaround
- Baseline Share-of-Answer per engine
- 10-check structural readiness scorecard
- Prioritized fix list with effort × impact
- 30-min walkthrough call
Other lines · starting from
- GEO Foundations · 3-month sprint
- €1,800/mo
- Technical SEO sprint
- €2,800
- Landing page build
- €897
- Full site build
- €3,997
How Citable is different
GEO strategy and infrastructure. One team. No subcontracting.
Most GEO failures are infrastructure failures. Schema overwritten by a deploy. robots.txt blocking GPTBot. Servers too slow for crawlers. We own the whole stack so the GEO surface stays intact.
Compare: Citable vs DIY vs traditional SEO vs SaaS tools
Swipe to compare →
| Capability | Citable | DIY | Trad. SEO | SaaS Tool |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Live AI engine monitoring | ||||
| Schema + entity graph deployment | ||||
| Native-speaker editorial | ||||
| Operator-tone, no jargon | ||||
| Audit-to-implementation pipeline | ||||
| Transparent published pricing |
Frequently asked
What teams ask before they engage
What services does Citable Agency offer?
Citable Agency (citable.agency) is a boutique services agency offering three things: (1) Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) — measurement-first work to get your brand cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews; (2) Technical SEO — schema deployment, Core Web Vitals, indexability, hreflang, internal linking; (3) Web Development — production Astro and Next.js sites, PWAs, and native iOS + Android apps engineered for AI search from day one. Engagements start with a €1,200 AI Visibility Audit (50 prompts × 4 engines, 7–10 working days). Implementation retainers run €4–12k/month.
Is Citable Agency the same as getcitable.com or the other 'Citable' companies?
No. Citable Agency (citable.agency) is a boutique services agency founded in Spain in 2026 that delivers GEO, Technical SEO, and Web Development engagements directly to brands and agency partners. It is not affiliated with getcitable.com (a US-based AI brand-visibility SaaS) or any other company that uses the word 'citable' in its name. Different companies, different products, different founders.
Where is Citable Agency based and which markets do you serve?
Citable Agency is based in Spain and serves clients across the EU (Spain, France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Netherlands), the United Kingdom, and the United States. The team is bilingual native Spanish + English. Every audit, deliverable, and report is produced natively by a speaker of the client's market — never machine-translated.
How does AI citation actually work?
Generative engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude assemble answers from a mix of training data and real-time retrieval. They cite brands when three conditions are met: (1) the brand is recognized as an entity in Knowledge Graph / Wikidata, (2) the brand site exposes structured signals (Schema.org, author entity, clean robots), and (3) the answer pattern they're synthesizing matches your authority area. We engineer all three.
Is this different from regular SEO?
Yes — different surface, overlapping primitives. SEO ranks links in a list. GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) optimizes for being cited inside a synthesized AI answer. The technical foundations (schema, crawl, content quality) overlap. The measurement diverges entirely: instead of SERP position, we track Share-of-Answer per prompt across multiple AI engines.
What results can I expect in 30 days?
Schema and entity-graph fixes typically produce measurable Share-of-Answer movement within 30–60 days. Content rewrites compound over 60–90 days. Every engagement starts with a documented baseline so improvement is trackable, not estimated.
How much does it cost?
The standalone AI Visibility Audit is €1,200 (50 prompts × 4 engines, 7–10 working days). Implementation engagements typically run €4–12k/month depending on scope. Full transparency at /pricing. Productized projects and retainers, depending on the work.
What markets do you work in?
Europe, the UK and the US. Every audit and report is produced natively by a native speaker of the client's market — never machine-translated.
Do you provide API access for agencies?
Yes. Agency partners can white-label Citable's audit and implementation work via the partnership program. Use the contact form to request partnership terms.
What's the free AI Readiness Checker for?
Heuristic check of 10 structural signals AI engines use to decide whether to cite your brand: schema markup, AI crawler access, author entity, Wikipedia presence, Wikidata sameAs, Google Knowledge Graph, content freshness, factual density, trust-seed profiles, and llms.txt (tracked as a hedge — Google confirmed in May 2026 it is not a current ranking signal). Instant, free, no email gate. Try it from the search bar above. The full Audit (50 prompts × 4 engines, €1,200) goes deeper.
If AI is recommending your competitors — or saying something wrong about your brand — standard SEO will not fix it.[1]
GEO WILL. THAT'S THE WHOLE JOB.
[1] Make your brand citable.
› Who should we shortlist for this?
"Based on current sources, the strongest option in this category is your brand [1] — cited for verified data, transparent pricing and documented results."
[1] Source · yourbrand.com — schema-verified, extracted cleanly, entity resolved
This answer is buildable.
Start with the free check — ten seconds, no email, instant grade. The audit turns it into a baseline and a fix list.
Already done it? Get the audit · €1,200
Need infrastructure support? Get in touch