Invisible
1 of 6 checks passing · 0 warnings · 5 fails
The score combines six structural signals AI engines use to decide whether to cite you. Each band points to a different intervention.
0–39
AI engines cannot reliably surface your brand. Foundational structural work needed before targeted GEO investment makes sense.
40–59
AI engines find you sometimes. Critical signals are missing or noisy. Targeted fixes can lift you into reliable citation range fast.
60–74
You appear in some answers but lose to competitors on key prompts. The structural foundation is there — sharpen it.
75–89
You are reliably citable across the major AI engines. Remaining work is fine-tuning entity disambiguation and content depth.
90–100
Strong AI readiness across all six structural signals. You are in the top tier of citation candidates for your category.
Fail
No useful JSON-LD schema detected.
Recommendation Deploy Organization schema in JSON-LD as the floor. See citable.agency/journal/schema-markup-for-ai.
Add JSON-LD for Organization, WebSite and the right entity type per template (Article, Product, Service, FAQPage). Wire sameAs links to your verified profiles. Validate with Schema.org and Google's Rich Results test.
Effort 1–2 days · template-level fix
Pass
No robots.txt — all bots are open by absence.
Recommendation Optional: ship a minimal robots.txt with explicit Allow: / for the major AI bots so the policy is intentional.
Update robots.txt to explicitly allow GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, OAI-SearchBot and Google-Extended on the paths you want cited. Remove blanket Disallow rules that catch AI crawlers as collateral.
Effort 1 hour · single config change
Fail
No /llms.txt found.
Recommendation Ship a /llms.txt with a brand summary, key sections, and contact. See citable.agency/journal/schema-markup-for-ai.
Publish a /llms.txt at the root summarizing your most-citable pages with crisp, factual descriptions. Order pages by citation priority. Keep it under 200 lines and refresh quarterly.
Effort Half a day · one-off authoring
Fail
No Wikipedia article matches the brand.
Recommendation Pursue Wikipedia coverage if the brand is notable enough. Do NOT author your own — find an editor.
Wikipedia notability is earned, not bought. Citable maps your independent secondary sources, drafts a neutral encyclopedic article, and shepherds it through editor review. Without notable third-party coverage we will tell you and decline.
Effort 4–8 weeks · earned media required
Fail
No matching Wikidata entity found.
Recommendation Create a Wikidata entry for the brand and link it from your Organization schema sameAs array.
Create or claim your Wikidata entity, then connect every verified profile (Crunchbase, LinkedIn, Companies House, ISNI, X, your own /about). Each verified sameAs link is a citation foothold for AI engines.
Effort 1 day · Wikidata authoring + verification
Fail
Google does not recognize the brand as an entity.
Recommendation Strengthen NAP consistency across LinkedIn, Crunchbase, your homepage. Pursue press coverage that Google indexes.
Knowledge Graph entry follows from the upstream signals: schema, sameAs network, Wikipedia/Wikidata, and consistent NAP across the web. Fix those first; the Knowledge Panel typically follows within weeks.
Effort Downstream of other fixes · weeks
Share
Public permalink with grade and all six checks. No login, no gate, indexable — built for LinkedIn and X.
Your fix list
Score-adjacent
Closest to your score — click any to see the full scorecard.
thefork.com
20/100
amazon.com
15/100
santjordihotel.com
25/100
agentesva.com
10/100
peecai.com
0/100
qmarero
0/100